DrugWatch - Jury Verdicts

Please choose a legal issue for more:



______ $400,000. Breakdown: $70,000 past wage loss; $320,000 future wage loss and $10,000 pain and suffering. - Wrongful Discharge Employment - Wrongful Discharge - Age Discrimination - Discrimination - Employment
Facts: Plaintiff, a 55 year old man, was employed as a salesman by Defendant Solvay Pharmaceuticals. Defendant allegedly discharged plaintiff for giving samples to physicians without following all of the proper procedures. A 33 year old employee had committed numerous infractions regarding samples and had received numerous warnings, but was not discharged. Plaintiff's supervisor had reti...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (116659) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Medical Malpractice Product Liability - Nicorette - Fatality - Product Liability - Defense Verdict - Strict Liability - Wrongful Death
Facts: Plaintiff's decedent, a long-time heavy smoker and drinker, entered a smoking cessation research program administered by the defendant physician. Defendant physician prescribed nicorette for the decedent. (Nicorette is a nicotine-laced chewing gum manufactured by Defendant Dow.) The decedent was diagnosed as having nicotine intoxication inducing a comatose state. One month later ...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (117887) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ $4 million against McNeil Pharmaceutical. Directed verdict for Burgerman and Smith. Breakdown: $1.5 million compensatory and $2.5 million punitives. - Products Liability Product Liability - Muscle Relaxant - Fatality - Punitive Damages - Wrongful Death
Facts: Plaintiff's decedent, a 75 year-old woman, was prescribed Parafon Forte DSC (chlorzoxazone), a muscle relaxant manufactured by Defendant McNeil, to treat numbness and stiffness in her hands. Defendant physicians read the drug's warnings and believed the drug to be safe. Two months thereafter decedent presented to the emergency room with a two-week history of progressively worsening...
- from The DC Verdict Reporter (96914) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ $250,000 - Pharmacy Ordered to Pay Damages to Woman Who Received Improper Instructions for Use of Antibiotic
Facts: A jury awarded $250,000 to a woman on her claim that she suffered long-term effects as a result of receiving incorrect information from a pharmacy on possible side effects of taking certain prescription medication with milk.

In October 2000, plaintiff was diagnosed with Lyme disease. Her doctor prescribed the antibiotic Doxycycline and she had the prescription filled at D...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (128153) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ VERDICT - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ACTION - PATENT INFRINGEMENT - PLAINTIFF ALLEGES THAT THE DEFENDANT INFRINGED UPON ITS PATENT RELATED TO THE DISCOVERY OF NATURAL CELL SIGNALING PHENOMENON IN THE HUMAN BODY.
In this intellectual property matter, the plaintiff, a biotechnology company, contended that the defendant pharmaceutical company infringed upon its patent related to the discovery of natural cell signaling in the human body. The defendant pharmaceutical company maintained that there was no infringement and disputed the validity of the plaintiff's patent.

The plaintiff, Ari...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (46351) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Pharmaceuticals Delivery Company Loses Claim for Financial Losses
Facts: A Buncombe County jury rejected a pharmaceutical delivery company's claim for damages after finding the company's driver was partially responsible for the collision that led to the loss. A defense verdict was entered after 3 hours of deliberation.

Plaintiff Hospira, Inc., a pharmaceutical and medication delivery company, lost a shipment of medications due to a motor vehic...
- from The Carolina Verdict Reporter (127649) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ DISMISSED by plaintiff on date of trial with prejudice Pharmaceutical products liability - Morning sickness drug Bendectin allegedly causes birth defects in minor plaintiff
The subject action was brought on behalf of the minor female plaintiff, who was born with severe birth defects following a pregnancy during which her mother ingested the morning sickness drug Bendectin. The plaintiff filed suit against the defendant pharmaceutical company which manufactured the drug alleging that the drug was defective and caused the minor plaintiff's birth ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (8975) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ VERDICT Products Liability/Medical Malpractice - Wrongful Death - failure of defendant pharmaceutical company and defendant physicians to warn decedent of risks associated with medication Nicorette.
In this Wrongful Death action, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical and the defendant physician failed to warn the decedent of the dangers and risks associated with the use of the medication Nicorette, prescribed to the decedent in conjunction with a broad office-based smoking cessation program. The plaintiff maintained that as a result, the ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (9443) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - ALLEGED WRONGFUL DEATH - ALLEGED BREACH OF IMPLIED AND EXPRESS WARRANTIES - ALLEGED NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION - PLAINTIFF ALLEGES POLYMER GEL PATCH WAS IMPROPERLY USED IN TREATMENT OF DECEDENT'S HEART DISEASE.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff administratrix, the sister of the decedent, in which it was contended that the defendant pharmaceutical company breached implied and express warranties and negligently misrepresented the effectiveness and use of a polymer gel patch used in the transdermal delivery of nitroglycerin into the system in the treatment of heart disease.
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (14992) Login for DrugWatch Verdict
______ VERDICT - PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTSLIABILITY - ALLEGED FAILURE OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LABELING ON ASPIRIN PRODUCTS GIVEN TO MINOR PLAINTIFF - PLAINTIFF ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPS REYE'S SYNDROME CAUSED BY INGESTION OF ASPIRIN - ACTION BIFURCATED AND TRIED INITIALLY ON ISSUES OF DIAGNOSIS AND CAUSATION.
This was a pharmaceutical products liability action brought by the plaintiff parents, individually, and on behalf of their minor son, who was eight years old when he was given two types of aspirin products manufactured by the defendants while he was suffering from chickenpox, as an alleged result of which he developed Reye's Syndrome. The plaintiffs contended that the defendant...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29346) Login for DrugWatch Verdict

Pages:   1   2   3   4   Next

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Need A DrugWatch Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Has Your Health Been Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Need A DrugWatch Lawyer?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Has Your Health Been Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your DrugWatch Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your DrugWatch case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * DrugWatch Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.